Pith. sign in

Researcher Evidence Record

Sam Witteveen

This bounded record lists 12 Pith paper rows and 0 imported work rows attributed to this corpus identity. The enumerated, non-disputed paper rows include cs.CL, cs.LG, cs.CV work dated 2019 to 2025. The record describes sources and coverage; it makes no judgment about the person.

Compiled coverage vector

Measured lane counts only. Not a trust score or person verdict.

Enumerated paper scope: 3 fields (cs.CL, cs.LG, cs.CV) · 2019-2025 sources: authors, author_identifiers · paper_authors · author_works · current_verdicts · cited_works

A sourced case file for attributed work. It is neither a profile score nor a verdict about this researcher.

Attributed works

A bounded ledger from the Pith paper and imported-work queries. Counts and source confidence stay with each work.

  1. 2025 Pith paper

    GPU Kernel Scientist: An LLM-Driven Framework for Iterative Kernel Optimization

    cs.LG provisional current review present

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Sam Witteveen
    Author position
    2
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: a current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    • 0 external cited by from arxiv_reference
    • 6 pith inbound references from cited_work_pith_inbound_counts
  2. 2025 Pith paper

    A Reasoning-Based Approach to Cryptic Crossword Clue Solving

    cs.CL provisional current review present

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Sam Witteveen
    Author position
    2
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: a current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  3. 2024 Pith paper

    Proving that Cryptic Crossword Clue Answers are Correct

    cs.CL provisional measured, no current review

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Sam Witteveen
    Author position
    2
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  4. 2022 Pith paper

    Investigating Prompt Engineering in Diffusion Models

    cs.CV provisional measured, no current review

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Sam Witteveen
    Author position
    1
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    • 1 pith inbound references from cited_work_pith_inbound_counts
  5. 2021 Pith paper

    Red Dragon AI at TextGraphs 2021 Shared Task: Multi-Hop Inference Explanation Regeneration by Matching Expert Ratings

    cs.CL provisional measured, no current review

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Sam Witteveen
    Author position
    2
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  6. 2020 Pith paper

    Red Dragon AI at TextGraphs 2020 Shared Task: LIT : LSTM-Interleaved Transformer for Multi-Hop Explanation Ranking

    cs.CL provisional measured, no current review

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Sam Witteveen
    Author position
    2
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  7. 2019 Pith paper

    Paraphrasing with Large Language Models

    cs.CL provisional measured, no current review

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Sam Witteveen
    Author position
    1
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    • 1 pith inbound references from cited_work_pith_inbound_counts
  8. 2019 Pith paper

    Red Dragon AI at TextGraphs 2019 Shared Task: Language Model Assisted Explanation Generation

    cs.CL provisional measured, no current review

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Sam Witteveen
    Author position
    2
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  9. 2019 Pith paper

    Unsupervised Natural Question Answering with a Small Model

    cs.CL provisional measured, no current review

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Sam Witteveen
    Author position
    2
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  10. 2019 Pith paper

    Scene Graph Parsing by Attention Graph

    cs.CL provisional measured, no current review

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Sam Witteveen
    Author position
    3
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  11. 2019 Pith paper

    Transformer to CNN: Label-scarce distillation for efficient text classification

    cs.LG provisional measured, no current review

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Sam Witteveen
    Author position
    2
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  12. 2019 Pith paper

    Relationships from Entity Stream

    cs.CL provisional measured, no current review

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Sam Witteveen
    Author position
    2
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.

Evidence apparatus

The machinery behind this record. Every lane states whether Pith measured it, did not query it, could not reach it, or withheld it.

LaneStateObservedBoundary and source
identity Measured 2 Canonical identity row plus public typed identifiers.
source=authors, author_identifiers
papers Measured 12 of 12 bounded rows Rows attributed to this author UUID in the Pith corpus.
source=paper_authors
works Measured zero 0 of 0 bounded rows Imported works not duplicated by the paper ledger.
source=author_works
reviews Measured 2 of 12 bounded rows Coverage count only. No review outcome is projected onto the person.
source=current_verdicts
citations Measured 3 of 12 bounded rows Counts remain itemized by work and source.
source=cited_works
coauthors Measured 3 of 12 bounded rows Shared-work edges from admitted paper rows.
source=paper_authors
account Unavailable No public count of 1 bounded rows Account metadata is separate from corpus evidence.
source=users.author_id
Public identity sources
  • name variant
    Sam Witteveen
    backfill
    confidence 0.6
Enumerated research scope

Fields and dates come only from enumerated, non-disputed Pith paper rows. They do not claim career completeness.

  • cs.CL9 rows
  • cs.LG2 rows
  • cs.CV1 rows
  • 20196 rows
  • 20201 rows
  • 20211 rows
  • 20221 rows
  • 20241 rows
  • 20252 rows
Shared-work index
Record scope

The work queries are bounded. Missing rows may mean measured zero, an unavailable source, a query that did not run, or private data that Pith withheld. The lane table keeps those cases separate.

Paper findings remain attached to papers. They do not become findings about this researcher.