Researcher Evidence Record
Shigeto Watanabe
This bounded record lists 4 Pith paper rows and 0 imported work rows attributed to this corpus identity. The enumerated, non-disputed paper rows include astro-ph.EP work dated 2017 to 2022. The record describes sources and coverage; it makes no judgment about the person.
Compiled coverage vector
A sourced case file for attributed work. It is neither a profile score nor a verdict about this researcher.
Attributed works
A bounded ledger from the Pith paper and imported-work queries. Counts and source confidence stay with each work.
-
2022 Pith paper
Reflectivity of Venus' dayside disk during the 2020 observation campaign: outcomes and future perspectives
paper paper evidence challenge this paper
Sources and evidence
- Authorship source
- arxiv_oai
- Printed name
- Shigeto Watanabe
- Author position
- 26
- Identity state
- provisional
- Source confidence
- 0.7
- Review coverage
- Measured: no current Pith review exists.
- Citation counts
- No source count is attached to this work row.
-
2019 Pith paper
Planetary-scale variations in winds and UV brightness at the Venusian cloud top: Periodicity and temporal evolution
paper paper evidence challenge this paper
Sources and evidence
- Authorship source
- arxiv_oai
- Printed name
- Shigeto Watanabe
- Author position
- 5
- Identity state
- provisional
- Source confidence
- 0.7
- Review coverage
- Measured: no current Pith review exists.
- Citation counts
- No source count is attached to this work row.
-
2019 Pith paper
Long-term variations of Venus' 365-nm albedo observed by Venus Express, Akatsuki, MESSENGER, and Hubble Space Telescope
paper paper evidence challenge this paper
Sources and evidence
- Authorship source
- arxiv_oai
- Printed name
- Shigeto Watanabe
- Author position
- 14
- Identity state
- provisional
- Source confidence
- 0.7
- Review coverage
- Measured: no current Pith review exists.
- Citation counts
- No source count is attached to this work row.
-
2017 Pith paper
Return to Venus of the Japanese Venus Climate Orbiter AKATSUKI
paper paper evidence challenge this paper
Sources and evidence
- Authorship source
- arxiv_oai
- Printed name
- Shigeto Watanabe
- Author position
- 19
- Identity state
- provisional
- Source confidence
- 0.7
- Review coverage
- Measured: no current Pith review exists.
- Citation counts
- No source count is attached to this work row.
Evidence apparatus
The machinery behind this record. Every lane states whether Pith measured it, did not query it, could not reach it, or withheld it.
| Lane | State | Observed | Boundary and source |
|---|---|---|---|
| identity | Measured | 2 | Canonical identity row plus public typed identifiers. source=authors, author_identifiers |
| papers | Measured | 4 of 4 bounded rows | Rows attributed to this author UUID in the Pith corpus. source=paper_authors |
| works | Measured zero | 0 of 0 bounded rows | Imported works not duplicated by the paper ledger. source=author_works |
| reviews | Measured zero | 0 of 4 bounded rows | Coverage count only. No review outcome is projected onto the person. source=current_verdicts |
| citations | Measured zero | 0 of 4 bounded rows | Counts remain itemized by work and source. source=cited_works |
| coauthors | Measured | 50 of 4 bounded rows | Shared-work edges from admitted paper rows. source=paper_authors |
| account | Unavailable | No public count of 1 bounded rows | Account metadata is separate from corpus evidence. source=users.author_id |
Public identity sources
-
name variant
Shigeto Watanabe
Enumerated research scope
- astro-ph.EP4 rows
- 20171 rows
- 20192 rows
- 20221 rows
Record scope
The work queries are bounded. Missing rows may mean measured zero, an unavailable source, a query that did not run, or private data that Pith withheld. The lane table keeps those cases separate.
Paper findings remain attached to papers. They do not become findings about this researcher.
Self-published account annex
Linked Pith account
Unavailable No public Pith account is linked to this corpus identity.
The account lane is self-published. Linking proves account control only and changes no corpus fact.