Pith. sign in

Researcher Evidence Record

Sara M. Clifton

This bounded record lists 6 Pith paper rows and 0 imported work rows attributed to this corpus identity. The enumerated, non-disputed paper rows include physics.soc-ph, q-bio.PE, econ.GN work dated 2015 to 2021. The record describes sources and coverage; it makes no judgment about the person.

Compiled coverage vector

Measured lane counts only. Not a trust score or person verdict.

Identity 2 canonical identity row plus typed public identifiers Pith papers 6 attributed paper rows in the Pith corpus, itemized below Imported works 0 imported works beyond the paper ledger Current reviews 0 of 6 papers carrying a current Pith review; presence, not outcome Sourced citations 0 of 6 works with a source-named citation count Coauthors 16 distinct coauthors across shared paper rows
Enumerated paper scope: 4 fields (physics.soc-ph, q-bio.PE, econ.GN, +1 more) · 2015-2021 sources: authors, author_identifiers · paper_authors · author_works · current_verdicts · cited_works

A sourced case file for attributed work. It is neither a profile score nor a verdict about this researcher.

Attributed works

A bounded ledger from the Pith paper and imported-work queries. Counts and source confidence stay with each work.

  1. 2021 Pith paper

    Modeling the Public Health Impact of E-Cigarettes on Adolescents and Adults

    physics.soc-ph provisional measured, no current review

    paper paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Sara M. Clifton
    Author position
    2
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  2. 2019 Pith paper

    Temperate and chronic virus competition leads to low lysogen frequency

    q-bio.PE provisional measured, no current review

    paper paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Sara M. Clifton
    Author position
    1
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  3. 2019 Pith paper

    Mathematical model of gender bias and homophily in professional hierarchies

    physics.soc-ph provisional measured, no current review

    paper paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Sara M. Clifton
    Author position
    1
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  4. 2017 Pith paper

    The tipping point: a mathematical model for the profit-driven abandonment of restaurant tipping

    econ.GN provisional measured, no current review

    paper paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Sara M. Clifton
    Author position
    1
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  5. 2017 Pith paper

    Hybrid statistical and mechanistic mathematical model guides mobile health intervention for chronic pain

    q-bio.QM provisional measured, no current review

    paper paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Sara M. Clifton
    Author position
    1
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  6. 2015 Pith paper

    Handicap principle implies emergence of dimorphic mating displays

    q-bio.PE provisional measured, no current review

    paper paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Sara M. Clifton
    Author position
    1
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.

Evidence apparatus

The machinery behind this record. Every lane states whether Pith measured it, did not query it, could not reach it, or withheld it.

LaneStateObservedBoundary and source
identity Measured 2 Canonical identity row plus public typed identifiers.
source=authors, author_identifiers
papers Measured 6 of 6 bounded rows Rows attributed to this author UUID in the Pith corpus.
source=paper_authors
works Measured zero 0 of 0 bounded rows Imported works not duplicated by the paper ledger.
source=author_works
reviews Measured zero 0 of 6 bounded rows Coverage count only. No review outcome is projected onto the person.
source=current_verdicts
citations Measured zero 0 of 6 bounded rows Counts remain itemized by work and source.
source=cited_works
coauthors Measured 16 of 6 bounded rows Shared-work edges from admitted paper rows.
source=paper_authors
account Unavailable No public count of 1 bounded rows Account metadata is separate from corpus evidence.
source=users.author_id
Public identity sources
  • name variant
    Sara M. Clifton     backfill
    confidence 0.6

identity history

Enumerated research scope

Fields and dates come only from enumerated, non-disputed Pith paper rows. They do not claim career completeness.

  • physics.soc-ph2 rows
  • q-bio.PE2 rows
  • econ.GN1 rows
  • q-bio.QM1 rows
  • 20151 rows
  • 20172 rows
  • 20192 rows
  • 20211 rows
Shared-work index
Record scope

The work queries are bounded. Missing rows may mean measured zero, an unavailable source, a query that did not run, or private data that Pith withheld. The lane table keeps those cases separate.

Paper findings remain attached to papers. They do not become findings about this researcher.