Pith. sign in

Researcher Evidence Record

Nishu Jain

This bounded record lists 6 Pith paper rows and 0 imported work rows attributed to this corpus identity. The enumerated, non-disputed paper rows include nucl-th work dated 2021 to 2025. The record describes sources and coverage; it makes no judgment about the person.

Compiled coverage vector

Measured lane counts only. Not a trust score or person verdict.

Identity 2 canonical identity row plus typed public identifiers Pith papers 6 attributed paper rows in the Pith corpus, itemized below Imported works 0 imported works beyond the paper ledger Current reviews 0 of 6 papers carrying a current Pith review; presence, not outcome Sourced citations 0 of 6 works with a source-named citation count Coauthors 8 distinct coauthors across shared paper rows
Enumerated paper scope: 1 field (nucl-th) · 2021-2025 sources: authors, author_identifiers · paper_authors · author_works · current_verdicts · cited_works

A sourced case file for attributed work. It is neither a profile score nor a verdict about this researcher.

Attributed works

A bounded ledger from the Pith paper and imported-work queries. Counts and source confidence stay with each work.

  1. 2025 Pith paper

    Exploring the role of low-lying intrinsic degrees of freedom and their impact on fusion cross-sections

    nucl-th provisional measured, no current review

    paper paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Nishu Jain
    Author position
    1
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  2. 2024 Pith paper

    Relativistic mean-field study of alpha decay in superheavy isotopes with 100 \texorpdfstring{$\leq$ Z $\leq$}-120

    nucl-th provisional measured, no current review

    paper paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Nishu Jain
    Author position
    1
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  3. 2023 Pith paper

    Systematic study of the effect of individual rotational energy levels on the fusion cross-section of \texorpdfstring{$^{16}O$}--based reactions of range $480 \le {Z_PZ_T} \le 592$

    nucl-th provisional measured, no current review

    paper paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Nishu Jain
    Author position
    1
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  4. 2022 Pith paper

    Exploring the ground state bulk and decay properties of the nuclei in superheavy island

    nucl-th provisional measured, no current review

    paper paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Nishu Jain
    Author position
    1
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  5. 2022 Pith paper

    Medium dependent relativistic NN potential: Application to the fusion dynamics

    nucl-th provisional measured, no current review

    paper paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Nishu Jain
    Author position
    3
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.
  6. 2021 Pith paper

    Structural and decay properties of nuclei appearing in the $\alpha$-decay chains of $^{296,298,300,302,304}$120 within the relativistic mean-field formalism

    nucl-th provisional measured, no current review

    paper paper evidence challenge this paper

    Sources and evidence
    Authorship source
    arxiv_oai
    Printed name
    Nishu Jain
    Author position
    2
    Identity state
    provisional
    Source confidence
    0.7
    Review coverage
    Measured: no current Pith review exists.
    Citation counts
    No source count is attached to this work row.

Evidence apparatus

The machinery behind this record. Every lane states whether Pith measured it, did not query it, could not reach it, or withheld it.

LaneStateObservedBoundary and source
identity Measured 2 Canonical identity row plus public typed identifiers.
source=authors, author_identifiers
papers Measured 6 of 6 bounded rows Rows attributed to this author UUID in the Pith corpus.
source=paper_authors
works Measured zero 0 of 0 bounded rows Imported works not duplicated by the paper ledger.
source=author_works
reviews Measured zero 0 of 6 bounded rows Coverage count only. No review outcome is projected onto the person.
source=current_verdicts
citations Measured zero 0 of 6 bounded rows Counts remain itemized by work and source.
source=cited_works
coauthors Measured 8 of 6 bounded rows Shared-work edges from admitted paper rows.
source=paper_authors
account Unavailable No public count of 1 bounded rows Account metadata is separate from corpus evidence.
source=users.author_id
Public identity sources
  • name variant
    Nishu Jain     backfill
    confidence 0.6

identity history

Enumerated research scope

Fields and dates come only from enumerated, non-disputed Pith paper rows. They do not claim career completeness.

  • nucl-th6 rows
  • 20211 rows
  • 20222 rows
  • 20231 rows
  • 20241 rows
  • 20251 rows
Shared-work index
Record scope

The work queries are bounded. Missing rows may mean measured zero, an unavailable source, a query that did not run, or private data that Pith withheld. The lane table keeps those cases separate.

Paper findings remain attached to papers. They do not become findings about this researcher.