pith. sign in
theorem

dAlembert_contDiff_nat

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Cost.AczelTheorem
domain
Cost
line
206 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

Continuous solutions H to the d'Alembert equation H(t+u)+H(t-u)=2H(t)H(u) with H(0)=1 are C^n for every finite n. Analysts studying functional equations or regularity bootstrap would cite this step. The argument extracts a nonzero integration width δ, invokes the representation formula expressing H via its antiderivative Phi, and proceeds by induction on n, lifting differentiability from H to Phi and back.

Claim. Let $H:ℝ→ℝ$ be continuous with $H(0)=1$ and satisfying the d'Alembert equation $H(t+u)+H(t-u)=2H(t)H(u)$ for all real $t,u$. Then $H$ belongs to $C^n$ for every natural number $n$.

background

The d'Alembert equation is the image of the Recognition Composition Law under the substitution $H(x)=J(x)+1$, where $J$ is the cost function from CostAlgebra. Phi is the antiderivative defined by Phi(H)(t) := ∫ from 0 to t of H(s) ds. The lemma exists_integral_ne_zero guarantees a δ>0 with Phi(δ)≠0. The representation_formula then states H(t)=(Phi(t+δ)−Phi(t−δ))/(2 Phi(δ)). The module proves every continuous solution of the d'Alembert equation with H(0)=1 is C^∞, completing the Aczél classification into the constant, cosh, and cos cases.

proof idea

The proof obtains δ from exists_integral_ne_zero and the representation formula from representation_formula. It then performs induction on n. The base case n=0 is immediate from continuity. In the successor step, phi_contDiff_succ lifts the induction hypothesis to ContDiff of Phi; composition with translation by ±δ produces ContDiff of Phi(t±δ); subtraction followed by division by the constant 2 Phi(δ) recovers ContDiff of H at order n+1.

why it matters

This supplies the finite-order bootstrap that feeds dAlembert_contDiff_smooth, which asserts full C^∞ regularity and enables the subsequent ODE derivation H''=cH together with the classification into cosh, cos, or constant solutions. It removes the former H_AczelClassification hypothesis that was the last foundation axiom. In the Recognition Science setting the result confirms that J-cost functions arising from the RCL are smooth, consistent with the phi-ladder and the eight-tick octave structure.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.