Pith. sign in
def

cmMinor44Matrix

definition
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Geometry.CofactorPolynomial
domain
Geometry
line
440 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

Normal form of the 4×4 diagonal minor of the bordered Cayley–Menger matrix for cofactor (4,4). Anyone expanding tetrahedral CM cofactors as polynomials in the six squared edges cites this matrix. The body is a literal matrix constructor from those squared-edge coordinates.

Claim. For squared edge lengths $a:\{0,\ldots,5\}\to\mathbb{R}$ of a tetrahedron, the normal form of the diagonal minor used by cofactor $(4,4)$ is the $4\times 4$ matrix $$\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 & a(0) & a(1) \\ 1 & a(0) & 0 & a(3) \\ 1 & a(1) & a(3) & 0 \end{pmatrix}.$$

background

The module expands every tetrahedral Cayley–Menger cofactor into an explicit polynomial in the six squared edge coordinates. Downstream dihedral-angle calculus can then name polynomial partials instead of opaque Fréchet derivatives.

SqEdges is the type of squared edge lengths of a tetrahedron, indexed by Fin 6. The classical Cayley–Menger setup borders a matrix of those squared distances by a row and column of ones (with a zero corner) so that a principal minor’s determinant encodes volume data and related geometric invariants.

Cofactor $(4,4)$ of the $5\times 5$ bordered matrix is (up to sign) the determinant of the complementary $4\times 4$ principal minor. This definition freezes that minor in a fixed coordinate normal form so later lemmas can equate it to a submatrix extraction and expand its determinant as a named polynomial.

proof idea

Pure definition: a matrix literal. The four rows are written with the constant border $(0,1,1,1)$ and $(1,\ldots)$, zeros on the squared-distance diagonal block, and the three relevant squared edges $a(0)$, $a(1)$, $a(3)$ in the off-diagonal slots. No lemmas are applied.

why it matters

Gives a concrete handle on the $(4,4)$ CM minor so the cofactor can be treated as an ordinary polynomial in squared edges. Immediately used by the equality that identifies this matrix with the submatrix of the full bordered CM matrix after deleting index 4, and by the determinant identity that expands $\det$ of this matrix to the named cofactor polynomial cmCofactor3Poly 4 4. Those steps sit in the cofactor analogue of the Cayley–Menger derivative pipeline: once every cofactor is an explicit polynomial, dihedral-angle formulas can differentiate named partials rather than opaque fderiv terms. Sibling minors (34, 24, 23, …) play the same role for the other cofactor slots.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.