Comparing two open LLMs, the paper claims that greater internal political feature richness predicts steerability and that refusals on benign prompts reflect capability deficits, but the causal evidence is missing.
Beyond Prompt Engineering: Robust Behavior Control in LLMs via Steering Target Atoms
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Precise control over language model generation is vital for ensuring both safety and reliability. Although prompt engineering and steering are commonly used to intervene in model behaviors, the vast number of parameters in models often results in highly intertwined internal representations. This interdependency can limit control precision and sometimes lead to unintended side effects. Recent research has explored the use of sparse autoencoders (SAE) to disentangle knowledge in high-dimensional spaces for steering. However, these applications have been limited to toy tasks owing to the nontrivial issue of locating atomic knowledge components. In this paper, we propose Steering Target Atoms (STA), a novel method that isolates and manipulates disentangled knowledge components to enhance safety. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. Further analysis reveals that steering exhibits superior robustness and flexibility, particularly in adversarial scenarios. We also apply the steering strategy to the large reasoning model, confirming its effectiveness in precise reasoning control.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
When Models Refuse: Political Steerability and Feature Richness as Measures of Ideological Depth
Comparing two open LLMs, the paper claims that greater internal political feature richness predicts steerability and that refusals on benign prompts reflect capability deficits, but the causal evidence is missing.