LiL vulnerabilities are more severe than ecosystem and conventional bugs and drop LLM-based repair Pass@1 by ~10.8%, with three categories often at 0% success.
VulnRepairEval: An exploit-based evaluation framework for assessing large language model vulnerability repair capabilities,
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
fields
cs.SE 2years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
A study protocol proposing a balanced crossover experiment to test whether LLM assistance in vulnerability patching accelerates fixes or introduces superficial insecure patches that pass functional but fail security validation.
citing papers explorer
-
Towards Demystifying and Repairing LLM-in-the-Loop Vulnerabilities
LiL vulnerabilities are more severe than ecosystem and conventional bugs and drop LLM-based repair Pass@1 by ~10.8%, with three categories often at 0% success.
-
Helpful or Harmful? Evaluating LLM-Assisted Vulnerability Patching via a Human Study
A study protocol proposing a balanced crossover experiment to test whether LLM assistance in vulnerability patching accelerates fixes or introduces superficial insecure patches that pass functional but fail security validation.