Fidelity estimation to a known rank-r reference state requires Theta-tilde(r^2/epsilon^2) copies, closing the factor-r gap between known upper and lower bounds.
The Keyl-Werner algorithm is not optimal for spectrum estimation
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We give an algorithm which, given $n = O(d^2 \cdot (\log\log(d)/\log(d))^2)$ copies of $\rho$, estimates the eigenvalues of $\rho$ to constant error in total variation distance. Thus, we can learn the eigenvalues of a quantum state with fewer copies than the $\Theta(d^2)$ needed to run full state tomography. This is the first improvement to spectrum estimation over the influential Keyl-Werner algorithm, which uses $n = \Theta(d^2)$ copies, thereby resolving a question raised by Keyl and Werner in 2001 and refuting a 2016 conjecture of Wright. Our main technical tool is a new tomography guarantee, where the error of tomography in a particular direction $|w\rangle$ scales with $\langle w | \rho |w\rangle$ for all directions simultaneously. From this stronger "relative-error" bound, we recover better algorithms for principal component analysis in Bures distance and tomography in $\chi^2$-divergence as corollaries.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
quant-ph 1years
2026 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
The Sample Complexity of Fidelity Estimation to a Known Rank-$r$ Reference State Is $\widetilde{\Theta}(r^2/\varepsilon^2)$
Fidelity estimation to a known rank-r reference state requires Theta-tilde(r^2/epsilon^2) copies, closing the factor-r gap between known upper and lower bounds.