A recursive agentic pipeline for literature synthesis showing a 21-fold source increase and 14.9-fold density gain when depth and breadth are raised.
YESciEval: Robust LLM-as-a-Judge for Scientific Question Answering
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) drive scientific question-answering on modern search engines, yet their evaluation robustness remains underexplored. We introduce YESciEval, an open-source framework that combines fine-grained rubric-based assessment with reinforcement learning to mitigate optimism bias in LLM evaluators. We release multidisciplinary scienceQ&A datasets, including adversarial variants, with evaluation scores from multiple LLMs. Independent of proprietary models and human feedback, our approach enables scalable, cost-free evaluation. By advancing reliable LLM-as-a-judge models, this work supports AI alignment and fosters robust, transparent evaluation essential for scientific inquiry.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.AI 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
DeepResearch$^{\text{Eco}}$: A Recursive Agentic Workflow for Complex Scientific Question Answering in Ecology
A recursive agentic pipeline for literature synthesis showing a 21-fold source increase and 14.9-fold density gain when depth and breadth are raised.