Combining supervised fine-tuning with closed-loop RL lets small Qwen LLMs tune an MPC controller, and the 3B model scores 63.3% versus 58.5% for GPT-4o on the paper's custom control adaptability metric.
NARRATE: Versatile Language Architecture for Optimal Control in Robotics
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The impressive capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) have led to various efforts to enable robots to be controlled through natural language instructions, opening exciting possibilities for human-robot interaction The goal is for the motor-control task to be performed accurately, efficiently and safely while also enjoying the flexibility imparted by LLMs to specify and adjust the task through natural language. In this work, we demonstrate how a careful layering of an LLM in combination with a Model Predictive Control (MPC) formulation allows for accurate and flexible robotic control via natural language while taking into consideration safety constraints. In particular, we rely on the LLM to effectively frame constraints and objective functions as mathematical expressions, which are later used in the motor-control module via MPC. The transparency of the optimization formulation allows for interpretability of the task and enables adjustments through human feedback. We demonstrate the validity of our method through extensive experiments on long-horizon reasoning, contact-rich, and multi-object interaction tasks. Our evaluations show that NARRATE outperforms current existing methods on these benchmarks and effectively transfers to the real world on two different embodiments. Videos, Code and Prompts at narrate-mpc.github.io
fields
cs.RO 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
RobotxR1: Enabling Embodied Robotic Intelligence on Large Language Models through Closed-Loop Reinforcement Learning
Combining supervised fine-tuning with closed-loop RL lets small Qwen LLMs tune an MPC controller, and the 3B model scores 63.3% versus 58.5% for GPT-4o on the paper's custom control adaptability metric.