A 14-probe benchmark on 12 LLMs finds consistent gender stereotype reasoning and unbalanced character representation across models.
Evaluating Large Language Models through Gender and Racial Stereotypes
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Language Models have ushered a new age of AI gaining traction within the NLP community as well as amongst the general population. AI's ability to make predictions, generations and its applications in sensitive decision-making scenarios, makes it even more important to study these models for possible biases that may exist and that can be exaggerated. We conduct a quality comparative study and establish a framework to evaluate language models under the premise of two kinds of biases: gender and race, in a professional setting. We find out that while gender bias has reduced immensely in newer models, as compared to older ones, racial bias still exists.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
GenderBench: Evaluation Suite for Gender Biases in LLMs
A 14-probe benchmark on 12 LLMs finds consistent gender stereotype reasoning and unbalanced character representation across models.