The authors expand LeCun's cake metaphor to the full AI lifecycle and argue that social outcomes are constrained by technical foundations such as the i.i.d. assumption, homogenization, catastrophic forgetting, and surrogate objectives.
Does CLIP Know My Face?
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
With the rise of deep learning in various applications, privacy concerns around the protection of training data have become a critical area of research. Whereas prior studies have focused on privacy risks in single-modal models, we introduce a novel method to assess privacy for multi-modal models, specifically vision-language models like CLIP. The proposed Identity Inference Attack (IDIA) reveals whether an individual was included in the training data by querying the model with images of the same person. Letting the model choose from a wide variety of possible text labels, the model reveals whether it recognizes the person and, therefore, was used for training. Our large-scale experiments on CLIP demonstrate that individuals used for training can be identified with very high accuracy. We confirm that the model has learned to associate names with depicted individuals, implying the existence of sensitive information that can be extracted by adversaries. Our results highlight the need for stronger privacy protection in large-scale models and suggest that IDIAs can be used to prove the unauthorized use of data for training and to enforce privacy laws.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.AI 1years
2025 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
The Cake that is Intelligence and Who Gets to Bake it: An AI Analogy and its Implications for Participation
The authors expand LeCun's cake metaphor to the full AI lifecycle and argue that social outcomes are constrained by technical foundations such as the i.i.d. assumption, homogenization, catastrophic forgetting, and surrogate objectives.