Pith. sign in

On the Power of Oblivious State Preparation

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

We put forth Oblivious State Preparation (OSP) as a cryptographic primitive that unifies techniques developed in the context of a quantum server interacting with a classical client. OSP allows a classical polynomial-time sender to input a choice of one out of two public observables, and a quantum polynomial-time receiver to recover an eigenstate of the corresponding observable -- while keeping the sender's choice hidden from any malicious receiver. We obtain the following results: - The existence of (plain) trapdoor claw-free functions implies OSP, and the existence of dual-mode trapdoor claw-free functions implies round-optimal (two-round) OSP. - OSP implies the existence of proofs of quantumness, test of a qubit, blind classical delegation of quantum computation, and classical verification of quantum computation. - Two-round OSP implies quantum money with classical communication, classically-verifiable position verification, and (additionally assuming classical FHE with log-depth decryption) quantum FHE. Several of these applications were previously only known via tailored LWE-based constructions, whereas our OSP-based constructions yield new results from a wider variety of assumptions, including hard problems on cryptographic group actions. Finally, towards understanding the minimal hardness assumptions required to realize OSP, we prove the following: - OSP implies oblivious transfer between one classical and one quantum party. - Two-round OSP implies public-key encryption with classical keys and ciphertexts. In particular, these results help to ''explain'' the use of public-key cryptography in the known approaches to establishing a ''classical leash'' on a quantum server. For example, combined with a result of Austrin et al. (CRYPTO 22), we conclude that perfectly-correct OSP cannot exist unconditionally in the (quantum) random oracle model.

fields

quant-ph 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

How to Verify that a Small Device is Quantum, Unconditionally

quant-ph · 2025-05-29 · conditional · novelty 7.0

The authors construct proofs of quantumness whose soundness is unconditional against memory-bounded classical adversaries, using Raz's parity-learning lower bound and bounded-storage interactive hashing.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • How to Verify that a Small Device is Quantum, Unconditionally quant-ph · 2025-05-29 · conditional · none · ref 9 · internal anchor

    The authors construct proofs of quantumness whose soundness is unconditional against memory-bounded classical adversaries, using Raz's parity-learning lower bound and bounded-storage interactive hashing.