Pith. sign in

Incentivized Truthful Communication for Federated Bandits

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

To enhance the efficiency and practicality of federated bandit learning, recent advances have introduced incentives to motivate communication among clients, where a client participates only when the incentive offered by the server outweighs its participation cost. However, existing incentive mechanisms naively assume the clients are truthful: they all report their true cost and thus the higher cost one participating client claims, the more the server has to pay. Therefore, such mechanisms are vulnerable to strategic clients aiming to optimize their own utility by misreporting. To address this issue, we propose an incentive compatible (i.e., truthful) communication protocol, named Truth-FedBan, where the incentive for each participant is independent of its self-reported cost, and reporting the true cost is the only way to achieve the best utility. More importantly, Truth-FedBan still guarantees the sub-linear regret and communication cost without any overheads. In other words, the core conceptual contribution of this paper is, for the first time, demonstrating the possibility of simultaneously achieving incentive compatibility and nearly optimal regret in federated bandit learning. Extensive numerical studies further validate the effectiveness of our proposed solution.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.LG 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

REJECT 1

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

Federated Linear Dueling Bandits

cs.LG · 2025-02-03 · reject · novelty 6.0

A new federated linear dueling bandit algorithm with claimed sublinear regret, but the key proof step is invalid.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Federated Linear Dueling Bandits cs.LG · 2025-02-03 · reject · none · ref 42 · internal anchor

    A new federated linear dueling bandit algorithm with claimed sublinear regret, but the key proof step is invalid.