Machine-learning classification of simulated photometric supernovae retains up to 75 percent of cosmological information with SALT2 features and roughly one third with Newling or wavelet features.
Statistical Classification Techniques for Photometric Supernova Typing
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Future photometric supernova surveys will produce vastly more candidates than can be followed up spectroscopically, highlighting the need for effective classification methods based on lightcurves alone. Here we introduce boosting and kernel density estimation techniques which have minimal astrophysical input, and compare their performance on 20,000 simulated Dark Energy Survey lightcurves. We demonstrate that these methods are comparable to the best template fitting methods currently used, and in particular do not require the redshift of the host galaxy or candidate. However both methods require a training sample that is representative of the full population, so typical spectroscopic supernova subsamples will lead to poor performance. To enable the full potential of such blind methods, we recommend that representative training samples should be used and so specific attention should be given to their creation in the design phase of future photometric surveys.
fields
astro-ph.CO 1years
2019 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
On the cosmological performance of photometrically classified supernovae with machine learning
Machine-learning classification of simulated photometric supernovae retains up to 75 percent of cosmological information with SALT2 features and roughly one third with Newling or wavelet features.