Mixed-methods research shows collective care practices are constrained by personal, relational, technological, and structural factors in existing PHI systems, leading to the CC-Proact operational map with three design levers and ten recommendations for collective health informatics.
Title resolution pending
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.HC 3years
2025 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
An interview study with 20 Singapore peer supporters maps their emotional, organisational, and sociocultural practices and derives design directions for culturally responsive digital tools and responsible AI augmentation of relational care.
Mixed-methods studies of an LLM-supported peer support system uncover systematic misalignments where mental health experts flag critical safety and fidelity issues in peer responses that the supporters themselves do not perceive.
citing papers explorer
-
Unpacking "Personal" Health Informatics for Proactive Collective Care
Mixed-methods research shows collective care practices are constrained by personal, relational, technological, and structural factors in existing PHI systems, leading to the CC-Proact operational map with three design levers and ten recommendations for collective health informatics.
-
"I Said Things I Needed to Hear Myself": Peer Support as an Emotional, Organisational, and Sociotechnical Practice in Singapore
An interview study with 20 Singapore peer supporters maps their emotional, organisational, and sociocultural practices and derives design directions for culturally responsive digital tools and responsible AI augmentation of relational care.
-
"Is This Really a Human Peer Supporter?": Misalignments Between Peer Supporters and Experts in LLM-Supported Interactions
Mixed-methods studies of an LLM-supported peer support system uncover systematic misalignments where mental health experts flag critical safety and fidelity issues in peer responses that the supporters themselves do not perceive.