pith. sign in

Light-Head R-CNN: In Defense of Two-Stage Object Detector

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

In this paper, we first investigate why typical two-stage methods are not as fast as single-stage, fast detectors like YOLO and SSD. We find that Faster R-CNN and R-FCN perform an intensive computation after or before RoI warping. Faster R-CNN involves two fully connected layers for RoI recognition, while R-FCN produces a large score maps. Thus, the speed of these networks is slow due to the heavy-head design in the architecture. Even if we significantly reduce the base model, the computation cost cannot be largely decreased accordingly. We propose a new two-stage detector, Light-Head R-CNN, to address the shortcoming in current two-stage approaches. In our design, we make the head of network as light as possible, by using a thin feature map and a cheap R-CNN subnet (pooling and single fully-connected layer). Our ResNet-101 based light-head R-CNN outperforms state-of-art object detectors on COCO while keeping time efficiency. More importantly, simply replacing the backbone with a tiny network (e.g, Xception), our Light-Head R-CNN gets 30.7 mmAP at 102 FPS on COCO, significantly outperforming the single-stage, fast detectors like YOLO and SSD on both speed and accuracy. Code will be made publicly available.

fields

cs.CV 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

representative citing papers

Are Candidate Models Really Needed for Active Learning?

cs.CV · 2026-05-14 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Active learning with randomly initialized models achieves comparable results to traditional candidate-model methods, with low-confidence sampling proving most effective.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Are Candidate Models Really Needed for Active Learning? cs.CV · 2026-05-14 · unverdicted · none · ref 6 · internal anchor

    Active learning with randomly initialized models achieves comparable results to traditional candidate-model methods, with low-confidence sampling proving most effective.