Pith. sign in

The Power of Distributed Verifiers in Interactive Proofs

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

We explore the power of interactive proofs with a distributed verifier. In this setting, the verifier consists of $n$ nodes and a graph $G$ that defines their communication pattern. The prover is a single entity that communicates with all nodes by short messages. The goal is to verify that the graph $G$ belongs to some language in a small number of rounds, and with small communication bound, i.e., the proof size. This interactive model was introduced by Kol, Oshman and Saxena (PODC 2018) as a generalization of non-interactive distributed proofs. They demonstrated the power of interaction in this setting by constructing protocols for problems as Graph Symmetry and Graph Non-Isomorphism -- both of which require proofs of $\Omega(n^2)$-bits without interaction. In this work, we provide a new general framework for distributed interactive proofs that allows one to translate standard interactive protocols to ones where the verifier is distributed with short proof size. We show the following: * Every (centralized) computation that can be performed in time $O(n)$ can be translated into three-round distributed interactive protocol with $O(\log n)$ proof size. This implies that many graph problems for sparse graphs have succinct proofs. * Every (centralized) computation implemented by either a small space or by uniform NC circuit can be translated into a distributed protocol with $O(1)$ rounds and $O(\log n)$ bits proof size for the low space case and $polylog(n)$ many rounds and proof size for NC. * We show that for Graph Non-Isomorphism, there is a 4-round protocol with $O(\log n)$ proof size, improving upon the $O(n \log n)$ proof size of Kol et al. * For many problems we show how to reduce proof size below the naturally seeming barrier of $\log n$. We get a 5-round protocols with proof size $O(\log \log n)$ for a family of problems.

fields

cs.DC 1

years

2019 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

Trade-offs in Distributed Interactive Proofs

cs.DC · 2019-08-09 · conditional · novelty 7.0

Distributed interactive proofs admit a continuous space-communication trade-off for triangle-freeness, broad communication savings from shared randomness, and a separation between interaction-reduction and linear-size proof-labeling schemes.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Trade-offs in Distributed Interactive Proofs cs.DC · 2019-08-09 · conditional · none · ref 22 · internal anchor

    Distributed interactive proofs admit a continuous space-communication trade-off for triangle-freeness, broad communication savings from shared randomness, and a separation between interaction-reduction and linear-size proof-labeling schemes.