For Hardy sequences of polynomial growth, the paper proves the 'difficult' direction of the joint ergodicity classification conjecture and gives a counterexample showing the converse fails in general.
Joint normality of representations of numbers: an ergodic approach
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We introduce an ergodic approach to the study of {\em joint normality} of representations of numbers. For example, we show that for any integer $b \geq 2$ almost every number $x \in [0,1)$ is jointly normal with respect to the $b$-expansion and continued fraction expansion. This fact is a corollary of the following result which deals with {\em pointwise joint ergodicity}: Let $T_b:[0,1] \rightarrow [0,1]$ be the times $b$ map defined by $T_b x = bx \, \bmod \, 1 $ and let $T_G:[0,1] \rightarrow [0,1]$ be the Gauss map defined by $T_G(x) = \{\frac{1}{x}\}$ for $x \ne 0$ and $T_G (0) =0.$ (Here $\{ \cdot \}$ denotes the fractional part.) For any $f, g \in L^{\infty} (\lambda)$, \[ \lim_{N \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{N } \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} f(T_b^{n}x) \, g(T_G^n x) = \int f \, d \lambda \cdot \int g \, d \mu_G \quad \text{for almost every } x \in [0,1], \] where $\lambda$ is the Lebesgue measure on $[0,1]$ and $\mu_G$ is the Gauss measure on $[0,1]$ given by $\mu_G (A) = \frac{1}{ \log 2} \int_A \frac{1}{1+x} dx$ for any measurable set $A \subset [0,1]$. We show that the phenomenon of the pointwise joint ergodicity takes place for a wide variety of number-theoretical maps of the interval and derive the corresponding corollaries pertaining to joint normality. We also establish the equivalence of various forms of normality and joint normality for representations of numbers, hereby providing a general framework for classical normality results.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
math.DS 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Resolving the joint ergodicity problem for Hardy sequences
For Hardy sequences of polynomial growth, the paper proves the 'difficult' direction of the joint ergodicity classification conjecture and gives a counterexample showing the converse fails in general.