Excess risk of SGD and ridge regression on GNNs is characterized through graph spectra, showing graph shape decides which algorithm generalizes better and deeper networks amplify the difference.
Subgroup Generalization and Fairness of Graph Neural Networks
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Despite enormous successful applications of graph neural networks (GNNs), theoretical understanding of their generalization ability, especially for node-level tasks where data are not independent and identically-distributed (IID), has been sparse. The theoretical investigation of the generalization performance is beneficial for understanding fundamental issues (such as fairness) of GNN models and designing better learning methods. In this paper, we present a novel PAC-Bayesian analysis for GNNs under a non-IID semi-supervised learning setup. Moreover, we analyze the generalization performances on different subgroups of unlabeled nodes, which allows us to further study an accuracy-(dis)parity-style (un)fairness of GNNs from a theoretical perspective. Under reasonable assumptions, we demonstrate that the distance between a test subgroup and the training set can be a key factor affecting the GNN performance on that subgroup, which calls special attention to the training node selection for fair learning. Experiments across multiple GNN models and datasets support our theoretical results.
fields
cs.LG 1years
2025 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
On the Interplay between Graph Structure and Learning Algorithms in Graph Neural Networks
Excess risk of SGD and ridge regression on GNNs is characterized through graph spectra, showing graph shape decides which algorithm generalizes better and deeper networks amplify the difference.