Adding pseudo-rewards, subjective effort valuation, and termination deliberation to metacognitive reinforcement learning models captures individual differences in planning strategy discovery but does not close the model-human discovery-rate gap.
Experience-driven discovery of planning strategies
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
One explanation for how people can plan efficiently despite limited cognitive resources is that we possess a set of adaptive planning strategies and know when and how to use them. But how are these strategies acquired? While previous research has studied how individuals learn to choose among existing strategies, little is known about the process of forming new planning strategies. In this work, we propose that new planning strategies are discovered through metacognitive reinforcement learning. To test this, we designed a novel experiment to investigate the discovery of new planning strategies. We then present metacognitive reinforcement learning models and demonstrate their capability for strategy discovery as well as show that they provide a better explanation of human strategy discovery than alternative learning mechanisms. However, when fitted to human data, these models exhibit a slower discovery rate than humans, leaving room for improvement.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.AI 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Individual differences in the cognitive mechanisms of planning strategy discovery
Adding pseudo-rewards, subjective effort valuation, and termination deliberation to metacognitive reinforcement learning models captures individual differences in planning strategy discovery but does not close the model-human discovery-rate gap.