Pith. sign in

A standardized Project Gutenberg corpus for statistical analysis of natural language and quantitative linguistics

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

The use of Project Gutenberg (PG) as a text corpus has been extremely popular in statistical analysis of language for more than 25 years. However, in contrast to other major linguistic datasets of similar importance, no consensual full version of PG exists to date. In fact, most PG studies so far either consider only a small number of manually selected books, leading to potential biased subsets, or employ vastly different pre-processing strategies (often specified in insufficient details), raising concerns regarding the reproducibility of published results. In order to address these shortcomings, here we present the Standardized Project Gutenberg Corpus (SPGC), an open science approach to a curated version of the complete PG data containing more than 50,000 books and more than $3 \times 10^9$ word-tokens. Using different sources of annotated metadata, we not only provide a broad characterization of the content of PG, but also show different examples highlighting the potential of SPGC for investigating language variability across time, subjects, and authors. We publish our methodology in detail, the code to download and process the data, as well as the obtained corpus itself on 3 different levels of granularity (raw text, timeseries of word tokens, and counts of words). In this way, we provide a reproducible, pre-processed, full-size version of Project Gutenberg as a new scientific resource for corpus linguistics, natural language processing, and information retrieval.

fields

cs.CL 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Influence-driven Curriculum Learning for Pre-training on Limited Data cs.CL · 2025-08-21 · unverdicted · none · ref 12 · internal anchor

    Sorting pre-training examples by training-data influence instead of human-judged difficulty reportedly gives over 10 percentage point benchmark gains over random order in limited-data language model pre-training.