A qualitative study with 22 creative writers finds that the reflective value of AI refusals depends on alignment with users' situational thinking phases, cognitive beliefs, and views of AI roles.
Title resolution pending
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
roles
background 2polarities
support 2representative citing papers
Chaplains view AI chatbots as unable to provide attuned pastoral care for non-clinical emotional needs, based on themes of listening, connecting, carrying, and wanting.
LLMs relocate rather than eliminate trade-offs among generality, accuracy, and simplicity, shifting complexity to infrastructure, compliance, and expertise and redefining competitive advantage around managing that shift.
Student-facilitated workshops in one design class produced AI policies highlighting double standards in disclosure requirements between students and faculty, demonstrating value in participatory governance.
citing papers explorer
-
Beyond Compliance: How AI Could Help Creative Writers by Refusing Them
A qualitative study with 22 creative writers finds that the reflective value of AI refusals depends on alignment with users' situational thinking phases, cognitive beliefs, and views of AI roles.
-
Chaplains' Reflections on the Design and Usage of AI for Conversational Care
Chaplains view AI chatbots as unable to provide attuned pastoral care for non-clinical emotional needs, based on themes of listening, connecting, carrying, and wanting.
-
From Model Design to Organizational Design: Complexity Redistribution and Trade-Offs in Generative AI
LLMs relocate rather than eliminate trade-offs among generality, accuracy, and simplicity, shifting complexity to infrastructure, compliance, and expertise and redefining competitive advantage around managing that shift.
-
Participatory, not Punitive: Student-Driven AI Policy Recommendations in a Design Classroom
Student-facilitated workshops in one design class produced AI policies highlighting double standards in disclosure requirements between students and faculty, demonstrating value in participatory governance.