A corpus-level study of 191 NFT-related EIPs finds a Draft/Final-bifurcated ecosystem centered on ERC-721/ERC-1155 inheritance, heavy reuse of core functions, skewed contributor participation, and security risk growing with functional complexity.
Are NFTs Ready to Keep Australian Artists Engaged?
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) offer a promising mechanism to protect Australian and Indigenous artists' copyright. They represent and transfer the value of artwork in digital form. Before adopting NFTs to protect Australian artwork, we in this paper investigate them empericially. We focus on examining the details of NFT structure. We start from the underlying structure of NFTs to show how they represent copyright for both artists and production owners, as well as how they aim to safeguard or secure the value of digital artworks. We then involve data collection from various types of sources with different storage methods, including on-chain, centralized, and decentralized systems. Based on both metadata and artwork content, we present our analysis and discussion on the following key issues: copyright, security and artist identification. The final results of the evaluation, unfortnately, show that the NFT is NOT ready to protect Australian and Indigenous artists' copyright.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CR 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Understanding NFTs from EIP Standards
A corpus-level study of 191 NFT-related EIPs finds a Draft/Final-bifurcated ecosystem centered on ERC-721/ERC-1155 inheritance, heavy reuse of core functions, skewed contributor participation, and security risk growing with functional complexity.