TASTE supplies designer ratings across nine criteria for outputs from four text-to-image models, with statistical tests showing moderate agreement and benchmarks where existing scorers reach at most 0.55 macro agreement while a new head reaches 0.611.
Graphic-Design-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating AI on Graphic Design Tasks
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We introduce GraphicDesignBench (GDB), the first comprehensive benchmark suite designed specifically to evaluate AI models on the full breadth of professional graphic design tasks. Unlike existing benchmarks that focus on natural-image understanding or generic text-to-image synthesis, GDB targets the unique challenges of professional design work: translating communicative intent into structured layouts, rendering typographically faithful text, manipulating layered compositions, producing valid vector graphics, and reasoning about animation. The suite comprises 50 tasks organized along five axes: layout, typography, infographics, template & design semantics and animation, each evaluated under both understanding and generation settings, and grounded in real-world design templates drawn from the LICA layered-composition dataset. We evaluate a set of frontier closed-source models using a standardized metric taxonomy covering spatial accuracy, perceptual quality, text fidelity, semantic alignment, and structural validity. Our results reveal that current models fall short on the core challenges of professional design: spatial reasoning over complex layouts, faithful vector code generation, fine-grained typographic perception, and temporal decomposition of animations remain largely unsolved. While high-level semantic understanding is within reach, the gap widens sharply as tasks demand precision, structure, and compositional awareness. GDB provides a rigorous, reproducible testbed for tracking progress toward AI systems that can function as capable design collaborators. The full evaluation framework is publicly available.
years
2026 2representative citing papers
Element-level leave-one-out analysis yields per-element quality scores and four structural metrics (purity, coverage, compactness, locality) that quantify SVG modularity and enable artifact detection.
citing papers explorer
-
TASTE: A Designer-Annotated Multi-Dimensional Preference Dataset for AI-Generated Graphic Design
TASTE supplies designer ratings across nine criteria for outputs from four text-to-image models, with statistical tests showing moderate agreement and benchmarks where existing scorers reach at most 0.55 macro agreement while a new head reaches 0.611.
-
Structural Evaluation Metrics for SVG Generation via Leave-One-Out Analysis
Element-level leave-one-out analysis yields per-element quality scores and four structural metrics (purity, coverage, compactness, locality) that quantify SVG modularity and enable artifact detection.