For 1.4 solar mass neutron stars the radius-deformability relation is nearly independent of higher-order nuclear parameters but strongly depends on the symmetry energy slope L, and the relation fails for 1.8 solar mass stars.
Insights on Skyrme parameters from GW170817
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The binary neutron-star merger event, GW170817, has cast a new light on nuclear physics research. Using a neutron-star model that includes a crust equation of state (EoS), we calculate the properties of a 1.4 solar-mass neutron star. The model incorporates more than 200 Skyrme energy density functionals, which describe nuclear matter properties, in the outer liquid core region of the neutron star. We find a power-law relation between the neutron-star tidal deformability, $\Lambda$, and the neutron-star radius, R. Without an explicit crust EoS, the model predicts smaller R and the difference becomes significant for stars with large radii. To connect the neutron star properties with nuclear matter properties, we confront the predicted values for $\Lambda$, against the Taylor expansion coefficients of the Skyrme interactions. There is no pronounced correlation between Skyrme parameters in symmetric nuclear matter and neutron star properties. However, we find the strongest correlation between $\Lambda$ and $K_{sym}$, the curvature of the density dependence of the symmetry energy at saturation density. At twice the saturation density, our calculations show a strong correlation between $\Lambda$ and total pressure providing guidance to laboratory nucleus-nucleus collision experiments.
fields
nucl-th 1years
2019 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
The key factor to determine the relation between radius and tidal deformability of neutron stars: slope of symmetry energy
For 1.4 solar mass neutron stars the radius-deformability relation is nearly independent of higher-order nuclear parameters but strongly depends on the symmetry energy slope L, and the relation fails for 1.8 solar mass stars.