INVARLLM automates extraction of physical invariants from CPS documentation via LLMs, then uses PCMCI+ scores and K-means to validate them, reporting case-level 100 percent precision on SWaT and WADI despite low raw sample-level precision.
Uncovering Limitations of Large Language Models in Information Seeking from Tables
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Tables are recognized for their high information density and widespread usage, serving as essential sources of information. Seeking information from tables (TIS) is a crucial capability for Large Language Models (LLMs), serving as the foundation of knowledge-based Q&A systems. However, this field presently suffers from an absence of thorough and reliable evaluation. This paper introduces a more reliable benchmark for Table Information Seeking (TabIS). To avoid the unreliable evaluation caused by text similarity-based metrics, TabIS adopts a single-choice question format (with two options per question) instead of a text generation format. We establish an effective pipeline for generating options, ensuring their difficulty and quality. Experiments conducted on 12 LLMs reveal that while the performance of GPT-4-turbo is marginally satisfactory, both other proprietary and open-source models perform inadequately. Further analysis shows that LLMs exhibit a poor understanding of table structures, and struggle to balance between TIS performance and robustness against pseudo-relevant tables (common in retrieval-augmented systems). These findings uncover the limitations and potential challenges of LLMs in seeking information from tables. We release our data and code to facilitate further research in this field.
fields
cs.CR 1years
2024 1verdicts
REJECT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
INVARLLM: LLM-assisted Physical Invariant Extraction for Cyber-Physical Systems Anomaly Detection
INVARLLM automates extraction of physical invariants from CPS documentation via LLMs, then uses PCMCI+ scores and K-means to validate them, reporting case-level 100 percent precision on SWaT and WADI despite low raw sample-level precision.