The optimal excess error for agnostic learning under instance-targeted poisoning is eTheta(sqrt(d eta)), achieved by a randomized learner and unavoidable even against adversaries who see the learner's random seed.
Intrinsic Certified Robustness of Bagging against Data Poisoning Attacks
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
In a \emph{data poisoning attack}, an attacker modifies, deletes, and/or inserts some training examples to corrupt the learnt machine learning model. \emph{Bootstrap Aggregating (bagging)} is a well-known ensemble learning method, which trains multiple base models on random subsamples of a training dataset using a base learning algorithm and uses majority vote to predict labels of testing examples. We prove the intrinsic certified robustness of bagging against data poisoning attacks. Specifically, we show that bagging with an arbitrary base learning algorithm provably predicts the same label for a testing example when the number of modified, deleted, and/or inserted training examples is bounded by a threshold. Moreover, we show that our derived threshold is tight if no assumptions on the base learning algorithm are made. We evaluate our method on MNIST and CIFAR10. For instance, our method achieves a certified accuracy of $91.1\%$ on MNIST when arbitrarily modifying, deleting, and/or inserting 100 training examples. Code is available at: \url{https://github.com/jjy1994/BaggingCertifyDataPoisoning}.
fields
cs.LG 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Agnostic Learning under Targeted Poisoning: Optimal Rates and the Role of Randomness
The optimal excess error for agnostic learning under instance-targeted poisoning is eTheta(sqrt(d eta)), achieved by a randomized learner and unavoidable even against adversaries who see the learner's random seed.