Delta energy, the energy gap between an image and its adversarial counterpart, separates catastrophic from robust overfitting, and penalizing it with the DER regularizer mitigates both while improving generation diversity.
Evaluating the Robustness of Geometry-Aware Instance-Reweighted Adversarial Training
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
In this technical report, we evaluate the adversarial robustness of a very recent method called "Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Training"[7]. GAIRAT reports state-of-the-art results on defenses to adversarial attacks on the CIFAR-10 dataset. In fact, we find that a network trained with this method, while showing an improvement over regular adversarial training (AT), is biasing the model towards certain samples by re-scaling the loss. Indeed, this leads the model to be susceptible to attacks that scale the logits. The original model shows an accuracy of 59% under AutoAttack - when trained with additional data with pseudo-labels. We provide an analysis that shows the opposite. In particular, we craft a PGD attack multiplying the logits by a positive scalar that decreases the GAIRAT accuracy from from 55% to 44%, when trained solely on CIFAR-10. In this report, we rigorously evaluate the model and provide insights into the reasons behind the vulnerability of GAIRAT to this adversarial attack. The code to reproduce our evaluation is made available at https://github.com/giuxhub/GAIRAT-LSA
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.LG 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Understanding Adversarial Training with Energy-based Models
Delta energy, the energy gap between an image and its adversarial counterpart, separates catastrophic from robust overfitting, and penalizing it with the DER regularizer mitigates both while improving generation diversity.