A MeshCNN-style convolutional network adapted to 2D CFD airfoil meshes classifies airfoil thickness ranges with roughly 67% stable and 83% peak accuracy, but the small self-made dataset and missing artifacts limit the result.
MeshCNN: A Network with an Edge
1 Pith paper cite this work, alongside 78 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Polygonal meshes provide an efficient representation for 3D shapes. They explicitly capture both shape surface and topology, and leverage non-uniformity to represent large flat regions as well as sharp, intricate features. This non-uniformity and irregularity, however, inhibits mesh analysis efforts using neural networks that combine convolution and pooling operations. In this paper, we utilize the unique properties of the mesh for a direct analysis of 3D shapes using MeshCNN, a convolutional neural network designed specifically for triangular meshes. Analogous to classic CNNs, MeshCNN combines specialized convolution and pooling layers that operate on the mesh edges, by leveraging their intrinsic geodesic connections. Convolutions are applied on edges and the four edges of their incident triangles, and pooling is applied via an edge collapse operation that retains surface topology, thereby, generating new mesh connectivity for the subsequent convolutions. MeshCNN learns which edges to collapse, thus forming a task-driven process where the network exposes and expands the important features while discarding the redundant ones. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our task-driven pooling on various learning tasks applied to 3D meshes.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
physics.comp-ph 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
AirCANS: CFD 2D Mesh Optimisation-based Airfoil Classification and Assessment using Neural Networks
A MeshCNN-style convolutional network adapted to 2D CFD airfoil meshes classifies airfoil thickness ranges with roughly 67% stable and 83% peak accuracy, but the small self-made dataset and missing artifacts limit the result.