Papers facing more demanding peer review with stronger criticism and higher revision burden show higher citation impact among those accepted at Nature Communications.
Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators.Research Policy, 46(8):1416–1436
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.DL 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Demanding peer review is associated with higher impact in published science
Papers facing more demanding peer review with stronger criticism and higher revision burden show higher citation impact among those accepted at Nature Communications.