Pith. sign in

RMB: Comprehensively benchmarking reward models in LLM alignment

5 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

5 Pith papers citing it

fields

cs.CL 5

representative citing papers

Boiling the Frog: A Multi-Turn Benchmark for Agentic Safety

cs.CL · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0 · 2 refs

Boiling the Frog is a new stateful multi-turn benchmark that finds an aggregate 44.4% strict attack success rate for incremental safety violations across nine AI models, with rates ranging from 20.5% to 92.9%.

RewardBench 2: Advancing Reward Model Evaluation

cs.CL · 2025-06-02 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

RewardBench 2 is a new benchmark that supplies challenging fresh human prompts for reward model evaluation, yielding lower average scores but higher correlation with downstream best-of-N sampling and RLHF training performance.

Qwen2.5 Technical Report

cs.CL · 2024-12-19 · unverdicted · novelty 3.0

Qwen2.5 LLMs scale pre-training data to 18 trillion tokens and apply multistage reinforcement learning, achieving competitive performance on benchmarks with models up to 5 times larger.

citing papers explorer

Showing 5 of 5 citing papers.

  • Boiling the Frog: A Multi-Turn Benchmark for Agentic Safety cs.CL · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · none · ref 100 · 2 links

    Boiling the Frog is a new stateful multi-turn benchmark that finds an aggregate 44.4% strict attack success rate for incremental safety violations across nine AI models, with rates ranging from 20.5% to 92.9%.

  • RMGAP: Benchmarking the Generalization of Reward Models across Diverse Preferences cs.CL · 2026-05-03 · unverdicted · none · ref 7

    RMGAP benchmark shows state-of-the-art reward models reach at most 49.27% Best-of-N accuracy when forced to select responses matching diverse preferences.

  • Personalized RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models with Human Aligned Personalization cs.CL · 2026-04-08 · conditional · none · ref 17

    A new personalization benchmark shows reward models are only ~76% accurate at identifying user-specific preference, and its scores track downstream BoN/PPO quality better than prior benchmarks.

  • RewardBench 2: Advancing Reward Model Evaluation cs.CL · 2025-06-02 · unverdicted · none · ref 13

    RewardBench 2 is a new benchmark that supplies challenging fresh human prompts for reward model evaluation, yielding lower average scores but higher correlation with downstream best-of-N sampling and RLHF training performance.

  • Qwen2.5 Technical Report cs.CL · 2024-12-19 · unverdicted · none · ref 45

    Qwen2.5 LLMs scale pre-training data to 18 trillion tokens and apply multistage reinforcement learning, achieving competitive performance on benchmarks with models up to 5 times larger.