An empirical analysis of 1,000 GitHub repositories finds 118 AI policies where 78% allow GenAI contributions, 51% require disclosure, and 74% mandate human oversight.
An Endless Stream of AI Slop
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
fields
cs.SE 3years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
AI slop in software externalizes review and integrity costs onto the commons, requiring institutional responses drawn from Ostrom's design principles.
Survey of 860 developers reveals 22 desired AI systems for non-coding tasks with explicit constraints on authority, provenance, and quality signals, framed as bounded delegation where AI handles assembly work but not core craft.
citing papers explorer
-
AI Policy, Disclosure, and Human in the Loop: How Are Contribution Guidelines Adapting to GenAI?
An empirical analysis of 1,000 GitHub repositories finds 118 AI policies where 78% allow GenAI contributions, 51% require disclosure, and 74% mandate human oversight.
-
AI Slop and the Software Commons
AI slop in software externalizes review and integrity costs onto the commons, requiring institutional responses drawn from Ostrom's design principles.
-
To Copilot and Beyond: 22 AI Systems Developers Want Built
Survey of 860 developers reveals 22 desired AI systems for non-coding tasks with explicit constraints on authority, provenance, and quality signals, framed as bounded delegation where AI handles assembly work but not core craft.