Using DESI DR1 distance measurements, flat LambdaCDM is decisively preferred over R_h=ct, driven almost entirely by the Lyman-alpha data point at redshift 2.33.
Model selection using time-delay lenses
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The sample of time-delay gravitational lenses appropriate for studying the geometry of the Universe continues to grow as dedicated campaigns, such as the Dark Energy Survey, the VST ATLAS survey, and the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, complete their census of high-redshift sources. This catalog now includes hundreds of strong lensing systems, at least 31 of which have reasonably accurate time delay measurements. In this paper, we use them to compare the predictions of two competing Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker models: flat LCDM, characterized by two adjustable parameters (H_0 and Omega_m), and the R_h=ct universe (with H_0 as the single free variable). Over the past decade, the latter has accounted for the data better than the standard model, most recently the emergence of well-formed galaxies discovered by JWST at cosmic dawn. Here we show that the current sample of time-delay lenses favours R_h=ct with a likelihood of ~84% versus ~16% for the standard model. This level of accuracy will greatly improve as the ongoing surveys uncover many thousands additional lens systems over the next several years.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
astro-ph.CO 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Comparison of $R_h=ct$ and $\Lambda$CDM using DESI DR1 measurements
Using DESI DR1 distance measurements, flat LambdaCDM is decisively preferred over R_h=ct, driven almost entirely by the Lyman-alpha data point at redshift 2.33.