A three-stage RAG pipeline generates a cited summary (GenText) from PubMed Central passages and ranks health documents by topical relevance plus alignment with that summary, outperforming baselines on CLEF eHealth and TREC Health Misinformation 2020.
Human-in-the-loop Evaluation for Early Misinformation Detection: A Case Study of COVID-19 Treatments
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We present a human-in-the-loop evaluation framework for fact-checking novel misinformation claims and identifying social media messages that support them. Our approach extracts check-worthy claims, which are aggregated and ranked for review. Stance classifiers are then used to identify tweets supporting novel misinformation claims, which are further reviewed to determine whether they violate relevant policies. To demonstrate the feasibility of our approach, we develop a baseline system based on modern NLP methods for human-in-the-loop fact-checking in the domain of COVID-19 treatments. We make our data and detailed annotation guidelines available to support the evaluation of human-in-the-loop systems that identify novel misinformation directly from raw user-generated content.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.IR 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Enhancing Health Information Retrieval with RAG by Prioritizing Topical Relevance and Factual Accuracy
A three-stage RAG pipeline generates a cited summary (GenText) from PubMed Central passages and ranks health documents by topical relevance plus alignment with that summary, outperforming baselines on CLEF eHealth and TREC Health Misinformation 2020.