Pith. sign in

Deaf, Hard of Hearing, and Hearing Perspectives on using Automatic Speech Recognition in Conversation

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Many personal devices have transitioned from visual-controlled interfaces to speech-controlled interfaces to reduce costs and interactive friction, supported by the rapid growth in capabilities of speech-controlled interfaces, e.g., Amazon Echo or Apple's Siri. A consequence is that people who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) may be unable to use these speech-controlled devices. We show that deaf speech has a high error rate compared to hearing speech, in commercial speech-controlled interfaces. Deaf speech had approximately a 78% word error rate (WER) compared to a hearing speech 18% WER. Our findings show that current speech-controlled interfaces are not usable by DHH people. Based on our findings, significant advances in speech recognition software or alternative approaches will be needed for deaf use of speech-controlled interfaces. We show that current speech-controlled interfaces are not usable by DHH people.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.HC 1

years

2019 1

verdicts

REJECT 1

roles

background 1

polarities

support 1

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.