A section-based extractive summarization system for scientific papers was rated better than a whole-paper version in a small author-run evaluation, though the test had notable biases.
Identification of Tasks, Datasets, Evaluation Metrics, and Numeric Scores for Scientific Leaderboards Construction
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
While the fast-paced inception of novel tasks and new datasets helps foster active research in a community towards interesting directions, keeping track of the abundance of research activity in different areas on different datasets is likely to become increasingly difficult. The community could greatly benefit from an automatic system able to summarize scientific results, e.g., in the form of a leaderboard. In this paper we build two datasets and develop a framework (TDMS-IE) aimed at automatically extracting task, dataset, metric and score from NLP papers, towards the automatic construction of leaderboards. Experiments show that our model outperforms several baselines by a large margin. Our model is a first step towards automatic leaderboard construction, e.g., in the NLP domain.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2019 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
A Summarization System for Scientific Documents
A section-based extractive summarization system for scientific papers was rated better than a whole-paper version in a small author-run evaluation, though the test had notable biases.