pith. sign in

Content-Based Citation Recommendation

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

We present a content-based method for recommending citations in an academic paper draft. We embed a given query document into a vector space, then use its nearest neighbors as candidates, and rerank the candidates using a discriminative model trained to distinguish between observed and unobserved citations. Unlike previous work, our method does not require metadata such as author names which can be missing, e.g., during the peer review process. Without using metadata, our method outperforms the best reported results on PubMed and DBLP datasets with relative improvements of over 18% in F1@20 and over 22% in MRR. We show empirically that, although adding metadata improves the performance on standard metrics, it favors self-citations which are less useful in a citation recommendation setup. We release an online portal (http://labs.semanticscholar.org/citeomatic/) for citation recommendation based on our method, and a new dataset OpenCorpus of 7 million research articles to facilitate future research on this task.

fields

cs.DL 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

representative citing papers

RWGBench: Evaluating Scholarly Positioning in Related Work Generation

cs.DL · 2026-05-30 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

RWGBench is a citation-centric benchmark for related work generation built from 40k CS papers and a 100-paper test set, with multi-dimensional metrics that better match human expert judgment than standard similarity scores.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • RWGBench: Evaluating Scholarly Positioning in Related Work Generation cs.DL · 2026-05-30 · unverdicted · none · ref 2 · internal anchor

    RWGBench is a citation-centric benchmark for related work generation built from 40k CS papers and a 100-paper test set, with multi-dimensional metrics that better match human expert judgment than standard similarity scores.