Nile-Chat models for dual-script Egyptian Arabic beat strong baselines on newly translated benchmarks, but the evaluation may be inflated by training/eval data overlap and Claude-generated script data.
AL-QASIDA: Analyzing LLM Quality and Accuracy Systematically in Dialectal Arabic
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Dialectal Arabic (DA) varieties are under-served by language technologies, particularly large language models (LLMs). This trend threatens to exacerbate existing social inequalities and limits LLM applications, yet the research community lacks operationalized performance measurements in DA. We present a framework that comprehensively assesses LLMs' DA modeling capabilities across four dimensions: fidelity, understanding, quality, and diglossia. We evaluate nine LLMs in eight DA varieties and provide practical recommendations. Our evaluation suggests that LLMs do not produce DA as well as they understand it, not because their DA fluency is poor, but because they are reluctant to generate DA. Further analysis suggests that current post-training can contribute to bias against DA, that few-shot examples can overcome this deficiency, and that otherwise no measurable features of input text correlate well with LLM DA performance.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Nile-Chat: Egyptian Language Models for Arabic and Latin Scripts
Nile-Chat models for dual-script Egyptian Arabic beat strong baselines on newly translated benchmarks, but the evaluation may be inflated by training/eval data overlap and Claude-generated script data.