Direct research on AI consciousness is intractable, so the field should prioritize studying perceived AI consciousness and its societal consequences.
Initial results of the Digital Consciousness Model
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Artificially intelligent systems have become remarkably sophisticated. They hold conversations, write essays, and seem to understand context in ways that surprise even their creators. This raises a crucial question: Are we creating systems that are conscious? The Digital Consciousness Model (DCM) is a first attempt to assess the evidence for consciousness in AI systems in a systematic, probabilistic way. It provides a shared framework for comparing different AIs and biological organisms, and for tracking how the evidence changes over time as AI develops. Instead of adopting a single theory of consciousness, it incorporates a range of leading theories and perspectives - acknowledging that experts disagree fundamentally about what consciousness is and what conditions are necessary for it. This report describes the structure and initial results of the Digital Consciousness Model. Overall, we find that the evidence is against 2024 LLMs being conscious, but the evidence against 2024 LLMs being conscious is not decisive. The evidence against LLM consciousness is much weaker than the evidence against consciousness in simpler AI systems.
fields
cs.CY 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
AI and Consciousness: Shifting Focus Towards Tractable Questions
Direct research on AI consciousness is intractable, so the field should prioritize studying perceived AI consciousness and its societal consequences.