LLM pipeline with generation-critic feedback reaches 61% accuracy on low-level goal extraction from requirements documents and outperforms standalone few-shot prompting, yet remains best suited as an accelerator for manual work.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.SE 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Evaluating LLM-Based Goal Extraction in Requirements Engineering: Prompting Strategies and Their Limitations
LLM pipeline with generation-critic feedback reaches 61% accuracy on low-level goal extraction from requirements documents and outperforms standalone few-shot prompting, yet remains best suited as an accelerator for manual work.