ReviewRL combines arXiv retrieval, supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning with a composite reward to generate paper reviews that better match human ratings and judged quality.
NLPeer: A Unified Resource for the Computational Study of Peer Review
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
abstract
Peer review constitutes a core component of scholarly publishing; yet it demands substantial expertise and training, and is susceptible to errors and biases. Various applications of NLP for peer reviewing assistance aim to support reviewers in this complex process, but the lack of clearly licensed datasets and multi-domain corpora prevent the systematic study of NLP for peer review. To remedy this, we introduce NLPeer -- the first ethically sourced multidomain corpus of more than 5k papers and 11k review reports from five different venues. In addition to the new datasets of paper drafts, camera-ready versions and peer reviews from the NLP community, we establish a unified data representation and augment previous peer review datasets to include parsed and structured paper representations, rich metadata and versioning information. We complement our resource with implementations and analysis of three reviewing assistance tasks, including a novel guided skimming task. Our work paves the path towards systematic, multi-faceted, evidence-based study of peer review in NLP and beyond. The data and code are publicly available.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
ReviewRL: Towards Automated Scientific Review with RL
ReviewRL combines arXiv retrieval, supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning with a composite reward to generate paper reviews that better match human ratings and judged quality.