Pith. sign in

A Few Observations on Sample-Conditional Coverage in Conformal Prediction

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

We revisit the problem of constructing predictive confidence sets for which we wish to obtain some type of conditional validity. We provide new arguments showing how ``split conformal'' methods achieve near desired coverage levels with high probability, a guarantee conditional on the validation data rather than marginal over it. In addition, we directly consider (approximate) conditional coverage, where, e.g., conditional on a covariate $X$ belonging to some group of interest, we would like a guarantee that a predictive set covers the true outcome $Y$. We show that the natural method of performing quantile regression on a held-out (validation) dataset yields minimax optimal guarantees of coverage here. Complementing these positive results, we also provide experimental evidence that interesting work remains to be done to develop computationally efficient but valid predictive inference methods.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

math.ST 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

ACCEPT 1

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

Distribution free M-estimation

math.ST · 2025-05-28 · accept · novelty 8.0

Distribution-free minimization of a convex loss is possible exactly when the loss is uniformly Lipschitz on compact subsets, plus a boundedness condition when the parameter space is unbounded.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Distribution free M-estimation math.ST · 2025-05-28 · accept · none · ref 18 · internal anchor

    Distribution-free minimization of a convex loss is possible exactly when the loss is uniformly Lipschitz on compact subsets, plus a boundedness condition when the parameter space is unbounded.