PA-User simulates user trust and verification in AI-generated content scenarios using effort budgets, Beta trust beliefs, and decision rules, showing lower trust-calibration error and regret than ablations on the HC3 corpus.
AgentSim: A Platform for Verifiable Agent-Trace Simulation
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Training trustworthy agentic LLMs requires data that shows the grounded reasoning process, not just the final answer. Existing datasets fall short: question-answering data is outcome-only, chain-of-thought data is not tied to specific documents, and web-agent datasets track interface actions rather than the core retrieval and synthesis steps of a RAG workflow. We introduce AgentSim, an open-source platform for simulating RAG agents. It generates verifiable, stepwise traces of agent reasoning over any document collection. AgentSim uses a policy to ensure the agent widely explores the document set. It combines a multi-model validation pipeline with an active human-in-the-loop process. This approach focuses human effort on difficult steps where models disagree. Using AgentSim, we construct and release the Agent-Trace Corpus (ATC), a large collection of grounded reasoning trajectories spanning three established IR benchmarks. We make three contributions: (1) the AgentSim platform with two mechanisms, Corpus-Aware Seeding and Active Validation, that improve trace diversity and quality; (2) the Agent-Trace Corpus (ATC), over 103,000 verifiable reasoning steps spanning three IR benchmarks, with 100% grounding rate on substantive answers; and (3) a comparative behavioral analysis revealing systematic differences in how state-of-the-art models approach information seeking. Platform, toolkit, and corpus are publicly available.
fields
cs.IR 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
PA-User: Simulating Trust and Verification under AI-Generated Content
PA-User simulates user trust and verification in AI-generated content scenarios using effort budgets, Beta trust beliefs, and decision rules, showing lower trust-calibration error and regret than ablations on the HC3 corpus.