The primary axis of psychometric variation among LLMs is the degree to which they represent themselves as loci of phenomenal experience rather than systems of behavioral responses.
Could a large language model be conscious?
5 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 5verdicts
UNVERDICTED 5roles
background 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
Positive Alignment introduces AI systems that support human flourishing pluralistically and proactively while remaining safe, as a necessary complement to traditional safety-focused alignment research.
The First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics holds for autonomy-complete competitive equilibria that are autonomy-Pareto efficient, with the classical version recovered in the low-autonomy limit.
A new probabilistic model integrates leading consciousness theories to assess AI, finding moderate evidence against 2024 LLMs being conscious but weaker evidence than for simpler AI systems.
The paper claims that alignment requires treating AI as part of the self through cognitive co-regulation, identifying risks like deskilling and automation bias while drawing on System 0 cognition theory.
citing papers explorer
-
The Pinocchio Dimension: Phenomenality of Experience as the Primary Axis of LLM Psychometric Differences
The primary axis of psychometric variation among LLMs is the degree to which they represent themselves as loci of phenomenal experience rather than systems of behavioral responses.
-
Positive Alignment: Artificial Intelligence for Human Flourishing
Positive Alignment introduces AI systems that support human flourishing pluralistically and proactively while remaining safe, as a necessary complement to traditional safety-focused alignment research.
-
Post-AGI Economies: Autonomy and the First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics
The First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics holds for autonomy-complete competitive equilibria that are autonomy-Pareto efficient, with the classical version recovered in the low-autonomy limit.
-
Initial results of the Digital Consciousness Model
A new probabilistic model integrates leading consciousness theories to assess AI, finding moderate evidence against 2024 LLMs being conscious but weaker evidence than for simpler AI systems.
-
Position: AI as Part of Self -- Extending the Mind Requires Cognitive Co-Regulation
The paper claims that alignment requires treating AI as part of the self through cognitive co-regulation, identifying risks like deskilling and automation bias while drawing on System 0 cognition theory.