Training on Prolog and PDDL representations improved several LLM reasoning benchmarks, but the controlled comparison does not show prototype training beats natural language training, and the abstract overstates the result.
HYBRIDMIND: Meta Selection of Natural Language and Symbolic Language for Enhanced LLM Reasoning
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
LLMs approach logical and mathematical reasoning through natural or symbolic languages. While natural language offers human-accessible flexibility but suffers from ambiguity, symbolic reasoning provides precise, machine-executable inferences at the cost of strict domain constraints. We introduce HYBRIDMIND, an adaptive strategy that selects the optimal reasoning approach for each reasoning problem. Through extensive experiments, we evaluate both prompting-based approaches with state-of-the-art LLMs and fine-tuned open-source models. We find that fine-tuning LLaMA-3.1-8B-Instruct as a meta-selector outperforms GPT-4o's natural language reasoning by 4.4\% on FOLIO and 1.3\% on MATH. More notably, using GPT-3.5-turbo as a prompted meta-selector yields a 10\% improvement on FOLIO's challenging subset compared to GPT-4o. We will release our code and data to support future research.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
ProtoReasoning: Prototypes as the Foundation for Generalizable Reasoning in LLMs
Training on Prolog and PDDL representations improved several LLM reasoning benchmarks, but the controlled comparison does not show prototype training beats natural language training, and the abstract overstates the result.