A digital twin of a real intersection can generate LiDAR training data that matches the target location, and a detector trained on it reported 4.8% higher car AP than a model trained on real data, though with more synthetic frames.
How much real data do we actually need: Analyzing object detection performance using synthetic and real data
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
In recent years, deep learning models have resulted in a huge amount of progress in various areas, including computer vision. By nature, the supervised training of deep models requires a large amount of data to be available. This ideal case is usually not tractable as the data annotation is a tremendously exhausting and costly task to perform. An alternative is to use synthetic data. In this paper, we take a comprehensive look into the effects of replacing real data with synthetic data. We further analyze the effects of having a limited amount of real data. We use multiple synthetic and real datasets along with a simulation tool to create large amounts of cheaply annotated synthetic data. We analyze the domain similarity of each of these datasets. We provide insights about designing a methodological procedure for training deep networks using these datasets.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CV 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
High-Fidelity Digital Twins for Bridging the Sim2Real Gap in LiDAR-Based ITS Perception
A digital twin of a real intersection can generate LiDAR training data that matches the target location, and a detector trained on it reported 4.8% higher car AP than a model trained on real data, though with more synthetic frames.