Pith. sign in

All models are wrong, some are useful: Model Selection with Limited Labels

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

We introduce MODEL SELECTOR, a framework for label-efficient selection of pretrained classifiers. Given a pool of unlabeled target data, MODEL SELECTOR samples a small subset of highly informative examples for labeling, in order to efficiently identify the best pretrained model for deployment on this target dataset. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that MODEL SELECTOR drastically reduces the need for labeled data while consistently picking the best or near-best performing model. Across 18 model collections on 16 different datasets, comprising over 1,500 pretrained models, MODEL SELECTOR reduces the labeling cost by up to 94.15% to identify the best model compared to the cost of the strongest baseline. Our results further highlight the robustness of MODEL SELECTOR in model selection, as it reduces the labeling cost by up to 72.41% when selecting a near-best model, whose accuracy is only within 1% of the best model.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.LG 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

Consensus-Driven Active Model Selection

cs.LG · 2025-07-31 · conditional · novelty 7.0

CODA uses consensus-based priors and Bayesian updating to select the best candidate model with far fewer labels than prior active model selection methods, beating them on 18 of 26 benchmark tasks.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Consensus-Driven Active Model Selection cs.LG · 2025-07-31 · conditional · none · ref 45 · internal anchor

    CODA uses consensus-based priors and Bayesian updating to select the best candidate model with far fewer labels than prior active model selection methods, beating them on 18 of 26 benchmark tasks.