Shape space in pure shape dynamics is best interpreted as a conceptual space, not a physical arena, requiring only epistemic commitment.
The Metaphysics of Machian Frame-Dragging
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The paper investigates the kind of dependence relation that best portrays Machian frame-dragging in general relativity. The question is tricky because frame-dragging relates local inertial frames to distant distributions of matter in a time-independent way, thus establishing some sort of non-local link between the two. For this reason, a plain causal interpretation of frame-dragging faces huge challenges. The paper will shed light on the issue by using a generalized structural equation model analysis in terms of manipulationist counterfactuals recently applied in the context of metaphysical enquiry by Schaffer (2016) and Wilson (2017). The verdict of the analysis will be that frame-dragging is best understood in terms of a novel type of dependence relation that is half-way between causation and grounding.
fields
physics.hist-ph 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Shape space as a conceptual space
Shape space in pure shape dynamics is best interpreted as a conceptual space, not a physical arena, requiring only epistemic commitment.